Daniel Brough is listed in New FamilySearch, PI#: LZ9S-1KG.
The birth of "Benjamin Brough" is listed in the online GRO Index and Staffordshire BMD, which combined states that his birth was registered in January-March 1862 in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England, and that his mother's surname was "Mee".
In the 1871 Census, "Benjamin Bruff" is listed as being 9 years old (born about 1862), born in Staffordshire, England, and residing with his parents, Joseph Bruff (age 48) and Elizabeth (age 53), and three siblings, at: St. Hilda, Durham, England.
In the 1881 Census, Benjamin Brough is listed as being 19 years old (born about 1862), born in Kidsgrove, Staffordshire, unmarried and working as a "Warehouseman [in a] Pottery", and residing with his parents, Joseph and Elizabeth Brough, and his brother, John, at: 16 Bottom Row, Ranscliffe, Wolstanton, Staffordshire.
In the 1891 Census, Beng. Brough is listed as being 28 years old (born about 1863), born in Kidsgrove, Staffordshire, married and working as a "Bricklayers Labourer", and residing with his wife, Emma J., and their two children, at: Ravenscliff Rd., Wolstanton, Staffordshire.
In the 1901 Census, Benjamin Brough is listed as being 40 years old (born about 1861), born in Kidsgrove, Staffordshire, married and working as a "Potter's Warehouse Man", and residing with his wife, Emily J., and their six children, at: 34 Salisbury St., Tunstall, Staffordshire.
In the 1911 Census, Benjamin Brough is listed as being 48 years old (born about 1863), born in Kidsgrove, Staffordshire, married for 25 years (married in about 1886), working as a "Collier-hewer", and residing with his wife, Emily J., and their six children, at: 34 Salisbury Street, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire.
Emily Jane Swinscoe is listed in New FamilySearch, PI#: LZT3-DTB.
In the 1891 Census, Emma J. (Brough) is listed as being 25 years old (born about 1866), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, married and residing with her husband with her husband, Beng. Brough, and their two children, at: Ravenscliff Rd., Wolstanton, Staffordshire.
In the 1901 Census, Emily J. (Brough) is listed as being 35 years old (born about 1866), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, married and residing with her husband, Benjamin Brough, and their six children, at: 34 Salisbury St., Tunstall, Staffordshire.
Marriage Notes for Benjamin Brough and Emily Jane Swinscoe-27517
The marriage of Benjamin Brough and Emily Jane Swinscoe is listed in the online FreeBMD, and the Staffordshire BMD lists the marriage was a "Civil Marriage".
The birth of "Nelly Brough" is listed in the online FreeBMD, which states that her birth was registered in April-June 1888 in Wolstanton district (which includes Tunstall), Staffordshire.
The christening of "Nellie Brough" is listed in FamilySearch (FHL Film # 1526192, Item #11), which states that she was christened on 17 March 1888 at Christ Church in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, and that her parents were "Benjamin and Emily Jane Brough" of "Clive Street" and that Benjamin Brough was a "Potter".
In the 1891 Census, "Freadrick C. Brough" is listed as being 2 years old (born about 1889), born in New Jersey, America [the United States], and residing with his parents, Beng. and Emma J. Brough, and a sister, at: Ravenscliff Rd., Wolstanton, Staffordshire.
In the 1901 Census, Frederick C. Brough is listed as being 12 years old (born about 1889), born in Trenton [Mercer Co.], New Jersey, America [United States], and residing with his parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury St., Tunstall, Staffordshire.
The birth of Emily Elizabeth Brough is listed in the online FreeBMD, which states that her birth was registered in April-June 1891 in Wolstanton district, Staffordshire.
In the 1891 Census, Emy E. Brough is listed as being "1 month" old (born iin about March 1891--as the 1891 Cenus was taken on 5 April 1891), born in Kidsgrove, Staffordshire, and residing with her parents, Beng. and Emma J. Brough, and a brother, at: Ravenscliff Rd., Wolstanton, Staffordshire.
In the 1901 Census, Emily E. Brough is listed as being 10 years old (born about 1891), born in Kidsgrove, Staffordshire, and residing with her parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury St., Tunstall, Staffordshire.
In the 1911 Census, Emily E. Brough is listed as being 20 years old (born about 1891), born in Kidsgrove, Staffordshire, single and working as a "Gilder on Pottery", and residing with her parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury Street, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire.
The birth of "Harold Brough" is listed in the online FreeBMD and Staffordshire BMD, which states that his birth was registered in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England.
In the 1901 Census, "Harold Brough" is listed as being 8 years old (born about 1893), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, and residing with his parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury St., Tunstall, Staffordshire.
In the 1911 Census, "Harold Brough" is listed as being 18 years old (born about 1893), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, single and working as a "Joiner", and residing with his parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury Street, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire.
"Harold Brough" is listed in the "Commonwealth War Graves Commission" website (www.cwgc.org), which states that he was a "Private" in the "North Staffordshire Regiment" in World War I, that he died on 21 July 1918 at 25 years old (born about 1893), is listed in the Fouquieres Churchyard Extension in Pas de Calais, France, and was the "Son of Emily J. Brough, of 34, Salisbury St., Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, and the late Benjamin Brough."
The birth of Florence Gertrude Brough is listed in the online FreeBMD, which states that her birth was registered in January-March 1895 in Wolstanton district (which includes Tunstall), Staffordshire.
In the 1901 Census, Florence G. Brough is listed as being 6 years old (born about 1895), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, and residing with her parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury St., Tunstall, Staffordshire.
In the 1911 Census, Florence Brough is listed as being 16 years old (born about 1896), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, single and working as a "Lithographer on Pottery", and residing with her parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury Street, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire.
The birth of Margaret Brough is listed in the online FreeBMD, which states that her birth was registered in July-September 1897 in Wolstanton district (which includes Tunstall), Staffordshire.
In the 1901 Census, Margaret Brough is listed as being 4 years old (born about 1897), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, and residing with her parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury St., Tunstall, Staffordshire.
In the 1911 Census, Margaret Brough is listed as being 14 years old (born about 1897), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, working as a "Lithographer on Pottery", and residing with her parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury Street, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire.
The birth of Ethel Brough is listed in the online FreeBMD, which states that her birth was registered in April-June 1901 in Wolstanton district (which includes Tunstall), Staffordshire.
In the 1911 Census, Ethel Brough is listed as being 10 years old (born about 1901), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, and residing with her parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury Street, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire.
The birth of Gladys Brough is listed in the online FreeBMD, which states that her birth was registered in January-March 1903 in Wolstanton district (which includes Tunstall), Staffordshire.
In the 1911 Census, Gladys Brough is listed as being 8 years old (born about 1903), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, and residing with her parents, Benjamin and Emily J. Brough, and five siblings, at: 34 Salisbury Street, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire.
The christening of Joseph Brough is listed in FamilySearch (via the Bishop's Transcript for Church Lawton, Cheshire, FHL Film # 1655594), which states that he was christened on 18 August 1822 in Church Lawton, Cheshire, and that his parents were James Brough and Mary.
The 1844 marriage of "Joseph Brough" and "Elizabeth Mee" is listed in the parish register of Tunstall, Staffordshire (FHL Film # 1526192, Item #14), which states that they were married by Banns on 1 July 1844 in Christ Church, Tunstall, Staffordshire; that Joseph Brough was of "full" age and a "Bachelor" and "Black Smith" of "Tunstall", and that his father was "James Brough", a "Moulder"; and that Elizabeth Mee was of "full" age and a "Spinster" of "Tunstall", and that her father was "John Mee", a "Potter". The marriage was witnessed by "William Chasons" and "Ann Wood".
In the 1851 Census, Joseph Brough is listed as being 28 years old (born about 1823), born in Lawton, Cheshire, married and working as an "Engin[e] Fitter", and residing with his wife, Elizabeth, and their daughter Emma, in Tunstall, Staffordshire.
In the 1861 England Census, "Joseph Brough" is listed as being 39 years old (born about 1822), born in Red Bull, Cheshire, England, married and working as a "Moulder at the Forge", and residing with his wife, Elizabeth (age 43), and their four children (Thomas--age 9, John--age 7, Emma--age 4, and Hannah--age 3), at: Ranscliff, Staffordshire, England. (Geographical Note: Ranscliff is a township in Wolstanton parish, Staffordshire, England.)
In the 1871 Census, "Joseph Bruff" is listed as being 48 years old (born about 1823), born in Cheshire, England, married and working as a "Moulder", and residing with his wife, Elizabeth (age 53), and their four children (Thomas--age 20, John--age 18, Hannah--age 12, and Benjamin--age 9), at: St. Hilda, Durham, England.
In the 1881 Census, Joseph Brough is listed as being 57 years old (born about 1824), born in Ch[urch]:[-]Lawton, Cheshire, married and working as a "Moulder [of] Iron", and residing with his wife, Elizabeth, and their two sons, John and Benjamin, at: 16 Bottom Row, Ranscliffe, Wolstanton, Staffordshire.
The 1844 marriage of "Joseph Brough" and "Elizabeth Mee" is listed in the parish register of Tunstall, Staffordshire (FHL Film # 1526192, Item #14), which states that they were married by Banns on 1 July 1844 in Christ Church, Tunstall, Staffordshire; that Joseph Brough was of "full" age and a "Bachelor" and "Black Smith" of "Tunstall", and that his father was "James Brough", a "Moulder"; and that Elizabeth Mee was of "full" age and a "Spinster" of "Tunstall", and that her father was "John Mee", a "Potter". The marriage was witnessed by "William Chasons" and "Ann Wood".
In the 1851 Census, Elizabeth (Brough) is listed as being 33 years old (born about 1818), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, married and residing with her husband, Joseph Brough, and their daughter Emma, in Tunstall, Staffordshire.
In the 1861 England Census, "Elizabeth Brough" is listed as being 43 years old (born about 1818), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, married and residing with her husband, Joseph Brough (age 39), and their four children (Thomas--age 9, John--age 7, Emma--age 4, and Hannah--age 3), at: Ranscliff, Staffordshire, England. (Geographical Note: Ranscliff is a township in Wolstanton parish, Staffordshire, England.)
In the 1871 Census, "Elizabeth Brough" is listed as being 53 years old (born about 1818), born in Staffordshire, England, married and a "Moulder's wife", and residing with her husband, Joseph Bruff (age 48), and their four children (Thomas--age 20, John--age 18, Hannah--age 12, and Benjamin--age 9), at: St. Hilda, Durham, England.
In the 1881 Census, Elizaebth (Brough) is listed as being 62 years old (born about 1819), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, married and residing with her husband, Joseph Brough, and their two sons, John and Benjamin, at: 16 Bottom Row, Ranscliffe, Wolstanton, Staffordshire.
In the 1891 Census, Elizabeth (Brough) is listed as being 73 years old (born about 1818), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, a "Widow" who was working as a "Single Midwife", and residing at: Palmcroton St., Wolstanton, Staffordshire.
Marriage Notes for Joseph Brough and Elizabeth Mee-27797
The 1844 marriage of "Joseph Brough" and "Elizabeth Mee" is listed in the parish register of Tunstall, Staffordshire (FHL Film # 1526192, Item #14), which states that they were married by Banns on 1 July 1844 in Christ Church, Tunstall, Staffordshire; that Joseph Brough was of "full" age and a "Bachelor" and "Black Smith" of "Tunstall", and that his father was "James Brough", a "Moulder"; and that Elizabeth Mee was of "full" age and a "Spinster" of "Tunstall", and that her father was "John Mee", a "Potter". The marriage was witnessed by "William Chasons" and "Ann Wood".
The birth of "Mary Ann Brough" is listed in the online GRO Index and Staffordshire BMD, which combined states that her birth was registered in April-June 1845 in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England, and that her mother's surname was "Mee".
The christening of "Mary Ann Brough" is listed in the FamilySearch (FHL Film # 1526192, Item #7), which states that she was christened on 8 June 1845 in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, and that her parents were "Joseph and Elizabeth Brough" of "Tunstall" and that Joseph Brough was a "Moulder".
The 1847 birth of "Sarah Brough" is listed in the online GRO Index and Staffordshire BMD, which combined states that her birth was registered in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England, and that her mother's surname was "Mee" (in the GRO Index) or "Lee" (in the Staffordshire BMD).
The 1849 death of "Sarah Brough" is listed in the online GRO Index and Staffordshire BMD, which combined states that her death was registered in April-June 1849 in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England, and that she died when she was about "1" year old.
The birth of "Mary Ann Brough" is listed in the online GRO Index and Staffordshire BMD, which combined states that her birth was registered in July-September 1849 in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England, and that her mother's surname was "Mee".
In the 1851 Census, Emma Brough is listed as being 1 year old (born about 1850), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, and residing with her parents, Joseph and Elizabeth Brough, in Tunstall, Staffordshire.
The birth of "Thomas Brough" is listed in the online GRO Index and Staffordshire BMD, which combined states that his birth was registered in October-December 1851 in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England, and that his mother's surname was "Mee".
In the 1861 England Census, "Thomas Brough" is listed as being 9 years old (born about 1852), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, and residing with his parents, Joseph Brough (age 39) and Elizabeth (age 43), and three siblings, at: Ranscliff, Staffordshire, England. (Geographical Note: Ranscliff is a township in Wolstanton parish, Staffordshire, England.)
In the 1871 Census, "Thomas Bruff" is listed as being 20 years old (born about 1851), born in Staffordshire, England, unmarried and residing with his parents, Joseph Bruff (age 48) and Elizabeth (age 53), and three siblings, at: St. Hilda, Durham, England.
The birth of "John Brough" is listed in the online GRO Index and Staffordshire BMD, which combined states that his birth was registered in January-March 1854 in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England, and that his mother's surname was "Mee".
The christening of "John Brough" is listed in the FamilySearch (FHL Film # 1526192, Item #8), which states that he was christened on 5 March 1854 in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, and that his parents were "Joseph and Elizabeth Brough" of "Tunstall" and that Joseph Brough was a "Moulder".
In the 1861 England Census, "John Brough" is listed as being 7 years old (born about 1854), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, and residing with his parents, Joseph Brough (age 39) and Elizabeth (age 43), and three siblings, at: Ranscliff, Staffordshire, England. (Geographical Note: Ranscliff is a township in Wolstanton parish, Staffordshire, England.)
In the 1871 Census, "John Bruff" is listed as being 18 years old (born about 1853), born in Staffordshire, England, and residing with his parents, Joseph Bruff (age 48) and Elizabeth (age 53), and three siblings, at: St. Hilda, Durham, England.
In the 1881 Census, "John Brough" is listed as being 27 years old (born about 1854), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, umarried and working as a "Moulder (Iron)", and residing with his parents, Joseph Brough (age 57) and Elizabeth (age 62), and two siblings, at: 16 Bottom Row, Ranscliffe, Staffordshire, England.
The birth of "Susanna Brough" is listed in the online GRO Index and Staffordshire BMD, which combined states that her birth was registered in January-March 1856 in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England, and that her mother's surname was "Mee".
The christening of "Susannah Brough" is listed in the FamilySearch (FHL Film # 1526192, Item #8), which states that she was christened on 17 February 1856 in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, and that her parents were "Joseph and Elizabeth Brough" of "Piccadilly Street" and that Joseph Brough was a "Moulder".
In the 1861 England Census, "Emma Brough" is listed as being 4 years old (born about 1857), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, and residing with her parents, Joseph Brough (age 39) and Elizabeth (age 43), and three siblings, at: Ranscliff, Staffordshire, England. (Geographical Note: Ranscliff is a township in Wolstanton parish, Staffordshire, England.)
The birth of "Hannah Brough" is listed in the online GRO Index and Staffordshire BMD, which combined states that her birth was registered in January-March 1858 in Tunstall subdistrict, Wolstanton district, Staffordshire, England, and that her mother's surname was "Mee".
In the 1861 England Census, "Hannah Brough" is listed as being 3 years old (born about 1858), born in Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, and residing with her parents, Joseph Brough (age 39) and Elizabeth (age 43), and three siblings, at: Ranscliff, Staffordshire, England. (Geographical Note: Ranscliff is a township in Wolstanton parish, Staffordshire, England.)
In the 1871 Census, "Hannah Bruff" is listed as being 12 years old (born about 1859), born in Staffordshire, England, and residing with her parents, Joseph Bruff (age 48) and Elizabeth (age 53), and three siblings, at: St. Hilda, Durham, England.
"John de Burgh" was of Kendal, Westmoreland. He was described in February 2015 by BFO researcher Michael McMichael, who stated the following about the early "de Burgh" family of Kendal, Westmoreland:
"Richard Burgh [stated in his Will of 1407] that he left lands in 'Kyrkebykendale' (now Kendal in Westmoreland) to his son, John, and lands in the village of 'Cales' to his sons Thomas and Peter. ...The British History Online entries [via: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/kendale-barony/vol1/pp1-22) for the town [of Kirkby Kendal] identified the following references to the Burgh family: 1310 - Roger de Burgh; 1357 - Peter de Brus (I think that this should be de Burgh, as the last Peter de Brus of note connected with Kendal died childless many decades earlier); 1365 - John de Burgh; 1382 - John de Burgh; 1390 - John de Burgh and Alice de Burgh; 1404 - Robert de Burgh and Alice de Burgh; 1409 - John, son of Richard and Thomas de Burgh; and 1411 - Robert de Burgh and John son of Richard de Burgh. I also came across this [online source]: http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/addtobasket/C9334636.
My conclusion from this is as follows: "Roger de Burgh was the first of the line in Kendal. There may also have been a William in the area around that time as well. However, I cannot establish any connection to other Brough lineages; Peter was probably the son of Roger and the father of John; John was in turn probably the father of John and Alice; Robert was the son of John and, in all likelihood, the brother (or cousin) of Richard Burgh who moved away from Kendal when he married into the Roos line (and note that they are also natives of this town), perhaps taking control of his wife's lands; and both John and Thomas are the two sons of Richard Burgh [of Cowthorpe, North Yorkshire].""John de Burgh" is listed in the following 1389 document (http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/addtobasket/C9334636) as follows:
Petitioners: John de Burgh, Richard de Burgh and Robert de Burgh, son of John de...
Reference: SC 8/222/11076
Description: Petitioners: John de Burgh, Richard de Burgh and Robert de Burgh, son of John de Burgh.
Name(s): de Burgh; de Burgh; de Burgh, John; Richard; Robert
Addressees: King.
Nature of request: The petitioners state that Thorneburgh and others came to Kendal armed in manner of war to attack them, so much so that the inhabitants fled thinking them to be a band of Scots. They request that the king issue writs to the sheriffs of Cumberland and Westmorland, and directly to the people involved, summoning them before him at the quindene of John the Baptist next to answer for their actions, under pain of £200.
Nature of endorsement: [None]
Places mentioned: Kirkeby in Kendal (Kendal), [Westmorland]; Westmorland; Cumberland.
People mentioned: William de Thorneburgh; John Dalamore; Paton de Heveryngton; Robert de Heveryngton; Thomas de Cokden; Richard Ellewold; John Beneson (Benson); Thomas Beneson (Benson); John Swynherde; John Gylpin; William Coke; Robert Mareschall (Marshall); sheriff of Westmorland; sheriff of Cumberland.
Note: Dated on the guard to 1389 with reference to SC 8/222/11077, the resultant writ to the sheriff of Westmorland, issued on 8 May 1389. The name of John Swynherde is crossed through as deleted, and does not appear in the resultant writ.
Related Material: For the resultant writ to the sheriff of Westmorland, see SC 8/222/11077
Held by: The National Archives, Kew
Legal status: Public Record
Language:FrenchJohn de Burgh is described as being "63" years old in 1399--and therefore born in about 1336, in the publication: "Inquisitions Post Mortem", Record Series, Vol.LIX" by the Yorkshire Archaeological Society (1918, page 164), which states: "John de Bergh, aged 63 [in 1399] was arrested that same day at Wyghale, and taken to York Castle by the Kings order" (online source: https://archive.org/stream/cu31924084250624#page/n175/mode/2up). In this same publication, "John de Burgh" he is described as being "of Sutton" (page 35) and having land in "North Couton [Cowton]" (page 88).
"Robert de Burgh" was of Kendal, Westmoreland. He was described in February 2015 by BFO researcher Michael McMichael, who stated the following about the early "de Burgh" family of Kendal, Westmoreland:
"Richard Burgh [stated in his Will of 1407] that he left lands in 'Kyrkebykendale' (now Kendal in Westmoreland) to his son, John, and lands in the village of 'Cales' to his sons Thomas and Peter. ...The British History Online entries [via: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/kendale-barony/vol1/pp1-22) for the town [of Kirkby Kendal] identified the following references to the Burgh family: 1310 - Roger de Burgh; 1357 - Peter de Brus (I think that this should be de Burgh, as the last Peter de Brus of note connected with Kendal died childless many decades earlier); 1365 - John de Burgh; 1382 - John de Burgh; 1390 - John de Burgh and Alice de Burgh; 1404 - Robert de Burgh and Alice de Burgh; 1409 - John, son of Richard and Thomas de Burgh; and 1411 - Robert de Burgh and John son of Richard de Burgh. I also came across this [online source]: http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/addtobasket/C9334636.
My conclusion from this is as follows: "Roger de Burgh was the first of the line in Kendal. There may also have been a William in the area around that time as well. However, I cannot establish any connection to other Brough lineages; Peter was probably the son of Roger and the father of John; John was in turn probably the father of John and Alice; Robert was the son of John and, in all likelihood, the brother (or cousin) of Richard Burgh who moved away from Kendal when he married into the Roos line (and note that they are also natives of this town), perhaps taking control of his wife's lands; and both John and Thomas are the two sons of Richard Burgh [of Cowthorpe, North Yorkshire].""Robert de Burgh" is listed in the following 1389 document (http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/addtobasket/C9334636) as follows:
Petitioners: John de Burgh, Richard de Burgh and Robert de Burgh, son of John de...
Reference: SC 8/222/11076
Description: Petitioners: John de Burgh, Richard de Burgh and Robert de Burgh, son of John de Burgh.
Name(s): de Burgh; de Burgh; de Burgh, John; Richard; Robert
Addressees: King.
Nature of request: The petitioners state that Thorneburgh and others came to Kendal armed in manner of war to attack them, so much so that the inhabitants fled thinking them to be a band of Scots. They request that the king issue writs to the sheriffs of Cumberland and Westmorland, and directly to the people involved, summoning them before him at the quindene of John the Baptist next to answer for their actions, under pain of £200.
Nature of endorsement: [None]
Places mentioned: Kirkeby in Kendal (Kendal), [Westmorland]; Westmorland; Cumberland.
People mentioned: William de Thorneburgh; John Dalamore; Paton de Heveryngton; Robert de Heveryngton; Thomas de Cokden; Richard Ellewold; John Beneson (Benson); Thomas Beneson (Benson); John Swynherde; John Gylpin; William Coke; Robert Mareschall (Marshall); sheriff of Westmorland; sheriff of Cumberland.
Note: Dated on the guard to 1389 with reference to SC 8/222/11077, the resultant writ to the sheriff of Westmorland, issued on 8 May 1389. The name of John Swynherde is crossed through as deleted, and does not appear in the resultant writ.
Related Material: For the resultant writ to the sheriff of Westmorland, see SC 8/222/11077
Held by: The National Archives, Kew
Legal status: Public Record
Language:French
Sir George Tailboys is listed in Wikipedia as follows:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Burgh_of_Gainsborough
Sir Thomas and Margaret had the following [five] children: [1:] Edward Burgh, 2nd Baron Burgh, married Anne Cobham, daughter of Thomas Cobham, 5th Baron Cobham and Lady Anne Stafford, and had issue. His grandson, Sir Edward Burgh, would marry Catherine Parr; later Queen consort of King Henry VIII. [2:] Elizabeth Burgh (d. 1 August 1507), married Richard FitzHugh, 6th Lord FitzHugh, and secondly Sir Henry Willoughby. [3:] Margaret Burgh (d. before April 1493), married Sir George Tailboys. Like her brother Edward, Lord Burgh, her husband Sir George was also found to be a lunatic in 1531. [4:] Thomas Burgh. [5:] Anne Burgh.
Margaret Burgh of Gainsborough is listed in Wikipedia as follows:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Burgh_of_Gainsborough
Sir Thomas and Margaret had the following [five] children: [1:] Edward Burgh, 2nd Baron Burgh, married Anne Cobham, daughter of Thomas Cobham, 5th Baron Cobham and Lady Anne Stafford, and had issue. His grandson, Sir Edward Burgh, would marry Catherine Parr; later Queen consort of King Henry VIII. [2:] Elizabeth Burgh (d. 1 August 1507), married Richard FitzHugh, 6th Lord FitzHugh, and secondly Sir Henry Willoughby. [3:] Margaret Burgh (d. before April 1493), married Sir George Tailboys. Like her brother Edward, Lord Burgh, her husband Sir George was also found to be a lunatic in 1531. [4:] Thomas Burgh. [5:] Anne Burgh.
"John Burgh" of Colthorpe, North Yorkshire, is listed in the "Burgh of Gainsborough" pedigree chart in the publication, "The Lincolnshire Gentry and the Wars of the Roses", by Jonathan S. Mackman (Ph.D. Thesis, Department of History, University of York, August 1999, page 284 (online source: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2492/1/DX210326.pdf), which states that he was the son of "Richard Burgh of Colthorpe, Yorks. (d.c.1407)" and "Margaret, dau. of Thomas, Lord Roos".
"Isabel, dau. of Sir Nicholas Monboucher[,] (d.1451)" of Colthorpe, North Yorkshire, is listed in the "Burgh of Gainsborough" pedigree chart in the publication, "The Lincolnshire Gentry and the Wars of the Roses", by Jonathan S. Mackman (Ph.D. Thesis, Department of History, University of York, August 1999, page 284 (online source: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2492/1/DX210326.pdf), which states that she was the wife of "John [Burgh] (d.1438)".
"Guy Rouclyff" is listed in the "Burgh of Gainsborough" pedigree chart in the publication, "The Lincolnshire Gentry and the Wars of the Roses", by Jonathan S. Mackman (Ph.D. Thesis, Department of History, University of York, August 1999, page 284 (online source: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2492/1/DX210326.pdf), which states that she was the daughter of "Richard Burgh of Colthorpe, Yorks. (d.c.1407)" and "Margaret, dau. of Thomas, Lord Roos", and that she married "Guy Rauclyff" and that they were the parents of "Brian Rouclyff, Baron of the Exchequer".
"Joan Burgh" of Colthorpe, North Yorkshire, is listed in the "Burgh of Gainsborough" pedigree chart in the publication, "The Lincolnshire Gentry and the Wars of the Roses", by Jonathan S. Mackman (Ph.D. Thesis, Department of History, University of York, August 1999, page 284 (online source: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2492/1/DX210326.pdf), which states that she was the daughter of "Richard Burgh of Colthorpe, Yorks. (d.c.1407)" and "Margaret, dau. of Thomas, Lord Roos", and that she married "Guy Rauclyff" and that they were the parents of "Brian Rouclyff, Baron of the Exchequer".
"Brian Rouclyff, Baron of the Exchequer" is listed in the "Burgh of Gainsborough" pedigree chart in the publication, "The Lincolnshire Gentry and the Wars of the Roses", by Jonathan S. Mackman (Ph.D. Thesis, Department of History, University of York, August 1999, page 284 (online source: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2492/1/DX210326.pdf), which states that she was the son of "Joan [Burgh"" and "Guy Rouclyff", and that he was "Baron of the Exchequer"--which was the King's department that collected revenue or taxes.
Eleanor reportedly married Sir William Musgrave and Edmund Croftes.